The speed, flexibility and initiative of the German Wehrmacht took the Allies completely by surprise during the blitzkrieg at the start of World War Two. The Schlieffen Plan was designed by Germany's Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen in 1905-06 as a deployment plan against the alliance that surrounded it. The action of Russia determined when Germany had to start her attack on France. It was named after its developer, Count Alfred von Schlieffen (18331913), former chief of the German general staff. Once again, Germany planned a surprise attack on France. Though not confirmed, allegedly after the failure at Marne the defeated General Moltke reported to Kaiser Wilhelm II, Your majesty, we have lost the war.. Soldiers complained that this kind of warfare was more strenuous than earlier mobile battles. Kluck agreed. And as military technology, including that of tanks, motor vehicles, aircraft and radios, was developed during the 1920s and 30s, so it was grafted onto this doctrinal framework. It called for 80% of German forces along the western border, and 20% on the eastern border. A huge German force would come swinging through northern France after invading Belgium and Holland, arcing around Paris to achieve decisive victory within a timetable of about six weeks. The original Schlieffen Plan was later changed by other military leaders. The British forces moved forward and reached Mons. Or just share our videos on Facebook, Twitter, Reddit etc. Why did the Schlieffen Plan fail? The Upper Rhine to the Swiss border and the Lower Alsace were to be defended by Landwehr brigades. He decided that France was the enemy to be defeated first, with Russia held off until the French were annihilated. In short, the offensive strategy now known as the Schlieffen Plan was only meant for a one front war, with Russia remaining neutral. Schlieffen realized that it would be hard to break through the heavily defended Burgundian Gate. If you have interesting historical questions, just post them and we will answer in our OUT OF THE TRENCHES videos. Indy Neidell takes you on a journey into the past to show you what really happened and how it all could spiral into more than four years of dire war. He did not solve the political problem of violating neutrality, but he lessened it by declining to invade Holland. The Maginot Line: the Allies expected a protracted, defensive war, The Allies believed that 'blitzkrieg' was dependent on new technology, such as tanks and dive-bombers, Schlieffen's doctrine formed the basis of 'blitzkrieg', Guderain recognised the importance of tanks. The Allied armies, completely unprepared for the rapid, mobile operations of the Germans, had simply been out-fought at every turn. Nearly two million soldiers fought. The man who crafted it was the German general chief of staff, General Alfred von Schlieffen. As well as the fact that Germany's army simply wasn't strong enough. It however had a couple of weaknesses, especially due to Von Moltke's modifications which doomed it to failure. The French followed their own strategy, Plan XVII, with support from the British. It was an ambitious plan designed to avoid Germany having to fight a two-front war against France and Russia. A Combat History of the First World War, Oxford University Press, 2013.Hart, Peter. It was crafted by the German General Staff over a decade beyond Schleiffen's original formulation. The boldness necessary for it to succeed had been watered down. The events in May and June 1940 proved that this outdated vision of war could not have been further from reality. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. That lead to the turning point in this war because they could not fight on the sea anymore. Schlieffen anticipated fierce French resistance, and thus knew that success depended on the deployment of the entire Germany army against France. For the full article, see, https://www.britannica.com/summary/Schlieffen-Plan. A Complete History, Holt Paperbacks, 2004.Hart, Peter. [], Amelia Earhart Found Again? https://www.history.com/news/was-germany-doomed-in-world-war-i-by-the-schlieffen-plan. Sign in. This was shown when there was a lot of killing at the Battle of Verdun in 1916. Kluck believed it was a safe move as he knew of no significant concentrations of enemy troops near Paris. Unlike a generation later when Adolf Hitler and the Nazi high command actively sought to create a two-front war, Imperial Germany knew that a war with either Russia or France meant a war with both.. Schlieffens plan was a sweeping, bold conception of how to achieve victory in a two-front war. However, the modern technology was merely used to enhance the capabilities that had already been provided, thanks to the army's strategic doctrine. Because Europe was dividing into two fronts, he thought that Russia and France were serious enemies. In the process of the German advance, as the Schlieffen Plan continued to move through the stages of its prospective sections, it was discovered that a gap had opened up between the advancing German armies, between the First Army under General von Kluck and the Second Army under General von Blow. Omissions? That army should have landed on the western side of Paris so as to encircle the city. the lack of communication between His adjustment left more German forces in the east. Belgium refused to let Germany pass through their land without fighting. Upon the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand in 1914, the European powers became quickly engulfed in an all-out war now known as World War I. Germany had prepared for this scenario years in advance, though the failure of the Schlieffen Plan led to a long drawn out conflict. HAAD Certified Dentists in Abu Dhabi. If you are a teacher and have questions about our show, you can get in contact with us on one of our social media presences. Life in the Trenches After the initial invasion of France by the Germans, the Allied troops pushed the German troops back to a stalemate position. WHAT IS THE GREAT WAR PROJECT? Germany faced a war on two fronts. They moved through Belgium, then plunged into France. Schlieffen's ideas were largely aimed at operational-level leaders, that is, the commanders of Germany's divisions and army corps. After von Schlieffen died, this plan was further worked on and altered by Helmuth von Moltke, his successor. BBC, n.d Web.). Following an order from Colonel Hentsch, German forces fell back to the Aisne River and began to dig in. Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Thus, in order to win, Schlieffen knew the German army would have to defeat its opponents quickly and decisively. It imposed severe restrictions on the possibility of finding a diplomatic solution to the July Crisis, because of its narrow time-frame for the initial deployment of troops. However, in order to maximize German flexibility and preparedness, Schlieffen also devised an offensive strategy for a one-front war solely with France. Select three reasons for this. France couldnt win because it didnt have a plan with Russia. French forces were in full retreat. French and British forces counterattacked on the Marne from September 6 to 10, 1914. https://www.military.com/history/world-war-i-schlieffen-plan.html, https://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/world-war-one/causes-of-world-war-one/the-schlieffen-plan/, https://www.open.edu/openlearn/history-the-arts/history/world-history/the-schlieffen-plan. They had promised to protect Belgium from enemies back in 1839. Ironically, this is exactly what Germany was anticipating. The Germans relied on trains to quickly transport their troops but many train lines were destroyed. The British Navy was also checking on ships to see if there was food for Germany. The battle was in France, 30 miles from Paris. Germany was surrounded by her enemies on every border. Despite the difficulties the Schlieffen Plan actually looked as if it might succeed. Accordingly, convinced that they were facing a repeat of the German strategy of 1914, Allied commanders moved the bulk of their forces from the Franco-Belgian border into defensive positions within Belgium to await the continuation of the German attack. It was called the Schlieffen Plan. The plan for the war made it very difficult to find a diplomatic solution. Schlieffen had great respect for the powers of France and Russia and knew Germany stood little chance in an all-out simultaneous two front war against both. Repelled by the waste and indecisiveness of trench warfare, they returned to the ideas of Schlieffen, and in 1921 the army published its new doctrine, Command and Combat with Combined Arms. In a general European war, Germany would face France in the west and Russia in the east, and would need to defeat France within six weeks before Russia mobilised her troops. The bridges of Paris were mined in preparation for blowing them up in case the German troops reached the capital. Find out on AlternateHistoryHub: http://bit.ly/1VJ9T0UThe Schlieffen Plan was the blueprint fo. But it turned out to be an ugly way of wearing everyone down during World War I. Klucks shift east had left the German flank exposed. The experience of World War One had convinced German leaders that these ideas needed to be applied not only at top operational level, but also at the tactical level - by combined-arms teams capable of independent fire and manoeuvre. Last updated 2011-03-30. It is thus that he devised several different strategies in 1905 for various potential future conflicts. 2015. They were aided in this by a heroic and legendary effort, which was celebrated ever afterward, as hundreds of taxicabs600 of them, to be precisebrought troops that had been stationed in Paris itself out to the battlefield, shuttling these men back and forth to get them to the places where they needed to be. After Schlieffens retirement as Chief of Staff in 1906, it was updated by his successor, Field Marshal Helmuth von Moltke. In March 1918, they found such a means. Should one nation go to war, it could drag virtually the entire continent along with it. Not your computer? It comes close to total victory at Mons and Charleroi where the BEF and French 5th Armies barely escape destruction. He also took troops away from the vast movement that was projected for the invasion of northern France; he instead drew off some of those troops to the Eastern Front and others for the defense of the territory of Lorraine to the south. A small, neutral country. It was at first a strategic plan whose purpose was to draw in outline the intention and objectives on the understanding that it would b. And the German solution to these problems was to apply Schlieffen's operational principles to small units as well as to large ones. Featuring: The unique archive material of British Path. France would surrender once Paris was taken, and then Germany would attack Russia. The Schlieffen plan was a plan of attack for Germany, mobilization and war were the same thing. Schlieffen's speedy attack and expected defeat of France never occurred - it's failure did usher in the era of trench warfare that is so much linked to World War One. The Schlieffen Plan was an operational plan used by the Germans to take over France and Belgium and carried out in August 1914. The rest of the German forces had to fall back to keep in line with them. The attack in 1914 was almost successful. Andrew Knighton is one of the authors writing for WAR HISTORY ONLINE. Russia would take six weeks to mobilise their army. It was designed for a war between France on one side and the German Empire, Austria-Hungary, and Italy on the other. Conclusion This caused the plan to fail because the army was now stuck in a battle of trench warfare and this bogged down their advance and meant that other countries including Rusia had more time to prepare. Next Indy explains the numerous reasons why the Schlieffen Plan was doomed to fail. By Robert T Foley P.S. Europe Goes To War, Knopf, 2013.Hirschfeld, Gerhard. He said, We lost the war. Four years later, Moltkes prediction would be true. The Schlieffen plan was made before World War I. They were to buy time for the Belgians, so they could receive support from the French and British, who despite Moltkes hopes joined in the war. While the French, Belgians, and British were not doing well, they were not doing as badly as predicted in the original plan. The plans call for speed was all very well, but outside their own borders, the Germans could not rely on control of a railway system to advance their forces. The Schlieffen Plan disregarded the political implications of what was regarded as essentially a technical solution to a military problem. When war broke out in 1914, his plan was adopted by another leader, Helmuth von Moltke. It is little known that Alfred von Schlieffen, whom the strategy is named after, actually devised two separate plans for war. This was because of how short-term it was. The German advance, however, had been slowed, with the Schlieffen Plan running behind schedule at crucial moments. This view that the Germans used technology, namely the tank and the dive-bomber, to create a new and unique form of warfare has often dominated understanding of how the Germans fought in World War Two. Germany had trouble controlling the seas and that is one reason they lost the war. His well-trained and organised troops had also caused France's Allies, in the form of the British Expeditionary Force (BEF), to beat an ignominious retreat from continental Europe. He was sure that if Germany were to fight a war against Russia and France at the same time, it would not be able to win. Instead, they ended up east of the city, exposing their right flank to the Parisian defenders themselves. From the Lecture Series: World War IThe Great War, December 1, 2017 History, Military History, World History. Helmut von Moltke adapted the original plan by Alfred von Schlieffen and ultimately failed when the Germans were beaten at the Battle of the Marne. If this happened then Germany assumed France would also attack them as she was a friend of Russia. Next. The Schlieffen Plan The most influential plan was that of Germany - the Schlieffen Plan - drawn up in 1905 by General Alfred von Schlieffen. But his influence continued after that day. and in the process, capturing Paris. Simply put, Germanys geopolitical challenge was the possibility of war on two fronts simultaneously. Across the English Channel, a stunned British military establishment struggled to determine how it was that events had so quickly gone so horribly wrong. The uniqueness of the Schlieffen Plan was that it ran counter to prevailing German military wisdom, which was principally derived from Carl von Clausewitzs seminal work On War (1832) and the strategic thought of the elder Helmuth von Moltke. Raymond Limbach is an independent historian who has an M.A. Instead, Germany went on the offensive on the Western Front, despite not having the manpower. German Emperor William II and his chancellor, Bernhard von Blow, believed that Great Britains alliance with Japan would lead to an encirclement of Germany and were cautious of such an attack. Schlieffen Plan , Plan of attack used by the German armies at the outbreak of World War I. Find out more about how the BBC is covering the. Of course! They attacked in the morning and it lasted all day. German general General Alfred von Schlieffen, The plan failed because it wasnt realistic, both Russia and France wanted to battle Germany, they employed a similar (though not identical) version in WWII, The Impact of World War INew World Disorder, The Great Powers of World War IGermanys Revolution, War, Nutritionism, and the Great Depression, The Great Powers of World War I Germanys Revolution, The Assassination ofArchduke Franz Ferdinand: Europe on the Brink of World War I. Germany wanted to avoid this at all costs. A battle in the open would generally only last for a day or so, trench battles went on for several days inflicting relentless stress and fatigue. II: Germany's Initial Conquests in Europe by German Research Institute for Military History (Clarendon Press, 1991), Storm of Steel: The Development of Armor Doctrine in Germany and the Soviet Union, 1919- 1939 by Mary B Habeck (Cornell University Press, 2003). We are happy if you show our channel to your friends, fellow students, classmates, professors, teachers or neighbours. Learn more about World War I: Destruction and Rebirth. He thought that war was inevitable. At the start of the 20th century, Germany had a strategy for fighting a war in Europe. Their weapons and strategies had moved on in 25 years, and they did not fall as easily as Schlieffen had anticipated. They write new content and verify and edit content received from contributors. If you enjoyed what you read and are a teacher or tutor needing resources for your students from kindergarten all the way up to high school senior (or even adults! Robert T Foley is a specialist on the development of German strategy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and lecturer in Defence Studies at King's College London and the Joint Services Command and Staff College. Subscribe to our channel and dont miss our new episodes every Thursday. As 29 German divisions advanced through the Netherlands and Belgium in the north, 45 further divisions, including about 2,400 tanks in 7 divisions, burst through the Allied right flank and drove towards the English Channel. Read more. He was younger and his plan was different than Schlieffens. He died in 1913, before WWI. Gerhard Ritter, a prominent German historian, published those studies in 1956 and concluded that the Schlieffen Plan was German doctrine prior to World War I. Blitzkrieg seemed to be based around the pervasive use of new technology. Despite desperate attempts by Winston Churchill to bolster French resolve, the defeat of the British and French armies in May effectively spelled the end of French resistance. The BEF was sent to join the line of French troops defending the border with Belgium. Required fields are marked * Comment * Name * The BEF had sailed for France believing that they and their French ally were well equipped and well trained to fight a modern war. You can find a selection of answers to the most frequently asked questions here: http://bit.ly/OOtrenches CAN I SHOW YOUR VIDEOS IN CLASS? The French plan, endorsed by commander Joseph Joffre, called for an all-out attack into Germany to regain the lost territories of Alsace-Lorraine, avenging the humiliating defeat of 1871, and redeeming French honor. Upon discovering that they were overextended and in peril of being simply overwhelmed by the German advance, both British and French forces moved back in a fast retreat, seeking a place to make a concerted stand. Schlieffen envisioned the attack would take no more than 6 weeks, as the capture of Paris and encirclement of the French army would lead France to seek peace. Schlieffen wished to emulate Hannibal by provoking an Entscheidungsschlacht (decisive battle), using a massive force, in a single act, to bring a swift and conclusive victory. What was the Schlieffen Plan BBC - History - The Western Front, 1914 - 1918 Animation n n n Count Alfred von Schlieffen drew up the Schlieffen Plan in 1905 when he was German Chief of Staff. The third group would concentrate on the most-southern right wing, with eight corps, five reserve corps, and Landwehr brigades, with the help of two mobile cavalry divisions. Why was it that Britain and France were outfought at every turn? Der Erste Weltkrieg. All rights reserved. Schlieffen Plan has been often considered as a demonstration of Field Marshal Helmuth von . But it was still the same idea: General Schlieffen decided that, even if the French attacked somewhere else in France, he would focus on the right-wing of the German army.